Author: 261640pwpadmin

  • Renters’ Rights Reforms

    Renters’ Rights Reforms

    Recent changes to rental law — often referred to as the Renters’ Rights reforms — are intended to strengthen protections for tenants and improve standards in the private rented sector. Much of the focus has been on evictions and security of tenure, but an important point is often missed:

    Tenants already have the right to recover rent where landlords break the law.

    These rights did not begin with the new reforms and continue to apply today.

    Under the Housing and Planning Act 2016, tenants can apply for a Rent Repayment Order (RRO) where a landlord commits certain housing offences. An RRO can require a landlord to repay up to 12 months’ rent, even if the tenant has since moved out.

    The most common example is renting out a property without the required licence, such as:

    The renewed emphasis on enforcement means: unlicensed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO), or

    a property subject to selective or additional licensing.Tenants already have the right to recover rent where landlords break the law.

    In other words, tenants are increasingly being encouraged — implicitly and explicitly — to enforce their existing rights.

    Determining whether a property should have been licensed, and whether rent may be recoverable, is not always straightforward. Rules vary by borough, and landlords rarely advertise non-compliance.

    London Tenant Services helps tenants:

    The Renters’ Rights reforms reinforce an important message: tenants do not have to accept unlawful renting.

    If you are — or were — renting privately in London and have any doubt about whether your landlord complied with the law, it is worth checking. Many tenants are surprised by what they may be entitled to recover.

  • West London RRO

    West London RRO

    Tenants of a shared house in West London were awarded £21,771.68 in rent repayments after a tribunal found that their landlord had been operating the property as an unlicensed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO).

    Since this case, new laws have been introduced to double tenant’s maximum possible rent repayment. Learn more here .

    The tribunal also confirmed that tenant behaviour does not remove a landlord’s legal obligation to comply with licensing requirements, and that Rent Repayment Orders exist to deter non-compliance and protect tenants’ rights.

    The landlord argued that he believed the property was licensed and blamed the failure on a former managing agent. However, the First-tier Tribunal ruled that landlords remain legally responsible for ensuring correct licensing and that he had failed to take reasonable steps to confirm that a valid licence was in place. As a result, the tribunal made a Rent Repayment Order requiring the landlord to repay rent to five tenants.

    Read the full report:

    Cases like this demonstrate that Rent Repayment Orders are a real, enforceable legal remedy. While many cases resolve through private settlement before reaching tribunal, the law allows tenants to recover substantial sums where landlords fail to meet their legal obligations.

  • Barking and Dagenham Applicability

    Barking and Dagenham Applicability

    London Tenant Services’ analysis indicates that Barking & Dagenham is likely the London borough with the highest concentration of properties exposed to Rent Repayment Orders (RROs).

    This conclusion is not based on anecdote or isolated tribunal cases. It is the result of systematic, borough-level analysis using:

    • Office for National Statistics (ONS) housing data
    • council-published licensing information
    • Freedom of Information (FOI) responses
    • and privately procured property and rental datasets

    Together, these sources point to a level of potential non-compliance that is materially higher than elsewhere in London — particularly in parts of the borough dominated by large, privately rented homes.

    LTS’s analysis shows that in some areas of Barking & Dagenham, as many as 94.7% of tenants renting 5-bedroom private properties may be living in homes that should be licensed but are not.

    In practical terms, this means:

    Neither assumption is correct.

    Where a landlord has failed to comply with licensing or other housing obligations, the law allows tenants to reclaim rent already paid, often covering many months of their tenancy.

    Importantly, many cases never reach tribunal. Once non-compliance is identified, they frequently resolve through private settlement.

    London Tenant Services is the only organisation we are aware of that proactively:

    We do not wait for tenants to complain after the fact. We focus on finding where the risk already exists.

    If you rent privately in Barking & Dagenham and have never checked whether your property required a licence, it is worth doing so. The financial implications can be substantial.